Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Middleton

Decided 1998-10-26

Cited by 101 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

STONE, Justice, dissenting. Although the majority has correctly determined the trial court erred in submitting the spoliation instruction, I believe the majority has erred in its harm analysis. I therefore dissent. Even assuming the spoliation instruction was wrongfully submitted, Wal-Mart has failed to show that the instruction caused or likely caused the rendition of an improper verdict. <e…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.