W & W Equipment Co., Inc. v. Mink

Decided 1991-03-18

Cited by 108 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

MILLER, Presiding Judge, concurring. I concur with the majority opinion. However, I note this is a case where findings of fact were requested and made pursuant to Trial Rule 52(B). In such a case, and where the findings are challenged as incomplete, we determine whether the findings support the judgment. Thus, it might seem strange to a reader of the majority opinion-at first blush-to see the majority depart…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.