Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co.

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1972-02-10

Cited by 191 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Chief Judge Fuld (dissenting in part). I agree with Justice McNally, dissenting below, that the plaintiff is entitled not only to recover damages but also to a permanent injunction against continuance of the defendant publisher’s wrong. There was a continuing obligation on the publisher’s part to use its “best efforts” to promote the object of the agreement between the parties, that is, to create a market for the…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.