Vail v. . Reynolds

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1890-01-14

Cited by 116 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Brown, J. The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover damages sustained by fraudulent representations inducing the purchase of stock of the Cisco Consolidated Gold Mining Company and had a judgment in her favor, which has been affirmed at the General Term. We think there was ample testimony to justify the submission of the case to the jury, and the exception t…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.