Unus v. Kane

U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · Decided 2009-05-06

Cited by 100 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the majority’s resolution of the constitutional and common law tort claims asserted by Aysha and Hanaa Unus and concur in those portions of the opinion. For the reasons stated in the district court’s fee order of April 28, 2005, however, I would affirm the award of attorney’s fees in favor of Rita Kat…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.