United States v. Zarina Lenetta Mullen, A/K/A Z

U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · Decided 1994-08-22

Cited by 120 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant, Zarina Lenetta Mullen, made a timely motion to have her lawyer, who was retained by her family, replaced by a court-appointed one. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in denying Mullen’s motion. Accordingly, we vacate her conviction and remand for the app…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.