United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation

Decided 1950-03-10

Cited by 503 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

WYZANSKI, District Judge. Defendant objects to the introduction of nearly 800 exhibits on the grouhd that they fall within the attorney-client privilege. The rule which allows a client to prevent the disclosure of information which he gave to his attorney for the purpose of securing legal assistance is founded upon the belief that it is necessary “in the…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.