United States v. Ruby Company, a Utah Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1978-12-29

Cited by 130 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ELY, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. As I see it, the result reached by my Brothers is not only unjust, but also, that result is not legally required. In Bart II of its opinion, the majority concludes that estoppel is not here applicable against the Government because the Government committed no affirmative misconduct. I hav…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.