United States v. Richard Junior Frazier

U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · Decided 2004-10-15

Cited by 1,209 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BARKETT, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the majority opinion and find exceedingly useful its parsing of the meth *1284 odology for admitting expert testimony that is based on experience. As the dissent accurately notes, the requirements of qualification and reliability are “often blurred in the case of experience-based expert testimony.” Bir…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.