United States v. Richard Harmon Bell

U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · Decided 1993-03-09

Cited by 269 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SELYA, Circuit Judge. This appeal asks, essentially, a single question: Must a district court, at a reconvened sentencing hearing following a defendant’s successful appeal, reexamine its explicit findings and conclusions on an issue not raised in the appeal and which the defendant had previously acknowledged to be correctly decided? Because we do not believe that the district cour…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.