United States v. Richard Annigoni

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1996-09-23

Cited by 161 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I agree with much in Judge Hawkins’s opinion and wish very much I could join it. In particular, I could not have expressed more clearly or eloquently the value of the peremptory challenge as a tool for ensuring not only that jurors be impartial, but that they appear so to the parties whose fates and fortunes they determine. I join Judge Leavy’s dissent because it reflects…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.