United States v. Oregon

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 1990-08-27

Cited by 174 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BEEZER, Circuit Judge: These appeals concern the Oregon district court’s approval of a plan allocating the harvest of Columbia River salmon and steelhead. The State of Idaho and the Shoshone-Bannock tribes challenge the allocation of fish that reach Idaho. They opposed the plan at the time of the district court’s approval hearings, but the court approved the plan over their objections. The Makah, an ocean fishing tribe, chal…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.