United States v. Oliver L. North

U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit · Decided 1990-11-30

Cited by 203 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

WALD, Chief Judge, dissenting as to Parts I, II, III: In his petition for rehearing, the Independent Counsel (“IC”) argues that the prohibitions of the use-immunity statute, 18 U.S.C. § 6002 , do not extend to the government’s use of witnesses who have independently exposed themselves to immunized testimony. Although the claim that the statute does not cover any such…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.