United States v. Monroe Adlman, as Officer and Representative of Sequa Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · Decided 1998-02-13

Cited by 376 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

LEVAL, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns the proper interpretation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3) (“the Rule”), which grants limited protection against discovery to doeu- *1195 ments and materials prepared “in anticipation of litigation.” 1 Specifically, we must address whether a study prepared for an attorney assessing the…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.