United States v. Lara

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 2004-04-19

Cited by 223 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice THOMAS, concurring in the judgment. As this case should make clear, the time has come to reexamine the premises and logic of our tribal sovereignty cases. It seems to me that much of the confusion *1642 reflected |21⅞⅛ our precedent arises from two largely incompatible and doubtful assumptions. First, Congress (rather than some other part of t…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.