United States v. Hill

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1919-01-13

Cited by 100 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*428 Mr. Justice McReynolds dissenting. When Hill carried liquor, from Kentucky into West Virginia for his personal use he did only what the latter State permitted. Construed as forbidding this action, because West Virginia had undertaken to forbid manufacture and sale of intoxicants, the Reed Amendment in no proper sense regulates interstate commerce, but…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.