United States v. Gonzalez-Aparicio

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2011-06-08

Cited by 101 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Today the majority announces a new and startling method of selecting a stan *434 dard of review, one in which the panel, at its sole option, selects which standard of review to apply. Because this standard of review is no standard at all, I respectfully dissent. If the majority had applied our long-established precedent…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.