United States v. Correll

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1967-12-11

Cited by 747 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Douglas, with whom Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Fortas concur, dissenting. The statutory words “while away from home,” 26 U. S. C. §162 (a)(2), may not in my view be shrunken to “overnight” by administrative construction or regulations. “Overnight” injects a time element in testing deductibility, while the statute speaks only in ter…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.