United States v. Articles of Device Consisting of Three Devices . . . "Diapulse''

Decided 1976-01-12

Cited by 137 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

MILLER, Circuit Judge. This action was brought in the district court, Eastern District of Kentucky, to condemn three devices known as Diapulse machines, 1 on the ground that they were misbranded within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 352 (f)(1), or more specifically, that their labeling failed to bear adequate instructions for use. On Septembe…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.