United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1981-02-23

Cited by 1,055 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Justice Brennan, with whom Justice Marshall joins, dissenting. Appellee Gerhard Fritz represents a class of retired former railroad employees who were statutorily entitled to Railroad Retirement and Social Security benefits, including an overlap herein called the “earned dual benefit,” until enactment of *183 the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, which dives…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.