Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1935-06-25

Cited by 137 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

CURTIS, J. We are in accord with the following portion of the opinion of the District Court of Appeal in the above-entitled cause and adopt the same as a part of our opinion: “On October 1, 1924, appellant and respondent, contemporaneously executed a farming contract and a beet sale contract, the latter being expressly made a part of the former, by the terms o…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.