Umbaugh Pole Building Co. v. Scott

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1979-06-06

Cited by 145 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Pottek, J. The first proposition of law advanced by the appellant is worded as follows: “A lending institution does not have any fiduciary •duty to its debtor even if ‘advice and counselling’ are offered to the debtor by the institution.” Both on the record and on the law we find that said proposition of law, to the extent hereinafter set forth, is well taken. The relations…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.