UETA Latinamerica, Inc. v. Zafir

Decided 2015-06-03

Cited by 248 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of *705 contract and unjust enrichment, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated February 23, 2012, as granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) t…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.