Twichel v. MIC General Insurance Corporation

Supreme Court of Michigan · Decided 2004-03-09

Cited by 107 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Cavanagh, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur in the majority’s analysis and conclusion regarding the personal protection insurance benefits in this case. However, I respectfully dissent with respect to the analysis contained in part in of the majority’s opinion and its conclusion regarding the unavailability of uninsured motorist benefits under defendant’s policy. I…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.