Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1979-06-18

Cited by 1,873 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Marshall, dissenting. In determining whether to imply a private cause of action for damages under a statute that does not expressly authorize such a remedy, this Court has considered four factors: “First, is the plaintiff 'one of the class for whose especial benefit the statute was enacted/ — that is, does the statute create a federal right in favor of the plainti…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.