Tingey v. Haisch

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2007-02-15

Cited by 111 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

¶1 — Petitioner attorney David Tingey performed legal services for respondents Lloyd and Lucy Haisch (hereinafter Haisch) on an hourly fee basis without *655 a written fee agreement. Tingey challenges a Court of Appeals decision holding that his action to collect those fees is not governed by the RCW 4.16.040(2) six-year limitation for “[a]n account receivable incurred in the ordinary course of bus…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.