Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological Society

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 1994-06-16

Cited by 247 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Guy, J. Petitioner Inland Empire Zoological Society, doing business as Walk in the Wild Zoo (hereafter Zoo), seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming a judgment against it in a personal injury action brought on behalf of Richard Tincani. We reverse and remand for a new trial. Facts On November 12, 1987, Richard Tincani, alo…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.