Tilton v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 1996-07-12

Cited by 500 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

ENOCH, Justice, joined by CORNYN and BAKER, Justices, concurring in part and dissenting in part. This matter is here on petition for writ of mandamus. Because mandamus is inappropriate, I would deny all relief. Consequently, I concur in the partial denial of relief but dissent from the Court’s judgment granting mandamus relief. I think it is safe to say that…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.