Thurston v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1965-07-07

Cited by 113 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Per Curiam. In this action, petitioner alleges that he is entitled to release because there was an unnecessary delay between the time of arrest and the time of being taken before a magistrate, that his codefendants were pressured into making confessions which were used at the trial, and that he was denied his right to counsel. Petitioner’s argument in relation to denial of counsel arises from the f…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.