Thielenhaus v. Thielenhaus

Decided 1995-09-25

Cited by 133 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPALA, Justice. This certiorari presses for our decision two first-impression issues: (1) What portion, if any, of the in-marriage 1 increase in the hus *928 band’s retirement fund is divisible as marital property? and if any be divisible,…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.