The People v. . the City Bank of Rochester

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1884-04-29

Cited by 105 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Danfoeth, J. The record shows that the firm of Sartwell, Hough Ford, doing business at Rochester1, were depositors with the Rochester City Bank, and that the bank also from time to time discounted their notes, payable in the city of New York, but with the understanding that they should in fact be paid at the bank. In November, 1882, two of such notes — one fo…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.