The Matter of James R. Diegelman v. City of Buffalo

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 2016-11-21

Cited by 262 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 168 In the Matter of James R. Diegelman et al., Appellants, v. City of Buffalo et al., Respondents. John A. Collins, for appellants. David M. Lee, for respondents. STEIN, J.: In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a police officer who is entitled to rec…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.