Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. United States

Decided 1972-04-14

Cited by 105 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Nichols, Judge, dissenting: It appears to me there is a fallacy in the commissioner’s recommended opinion, namely, he assumes that the defendant’s statements at the April 21 pre-bid conference were promissory in nature. I read them as misstatements of fact. They fall in the same category as the erroneous weather information the Government supplied in Chris Berg, Inc. v. < citation-i…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.