Sweeney v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 1977-07-08

Cited by 167 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

MANDERINO, Justice, concurring. I join in the opinion of the Court. However, I cannot accept the continued reliance, at pages 712 and 713, on the outmoded method of defining the scope of due process protections in terms of a “property interest.” It is sufficient to recognize that Mr. Sweeney’s interest is entitled to due process protection without having to analogize it to a right in pr…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.