Surace v. Danna

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1928-05-01

Cited by 142 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

O’Brien, J. (dissenting). Appellant’s claim to exemption from execution against moneys heretofore paid to him as compensation for injury rests upon this provision of section 33, Workmen’s Compensation Law: “ Compensation or benefits due under this chapter, shall not be assigned, released or commuted except as provided by this chapter, and shall be exempt from all claims of creditors an…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.