Stutman v. Chemical Bank

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 2000-05-18

Cited by 413 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge Kaye. This case requires us to determine whether a $275 bank fee assessed in connection with the refinancing of a homeowner’s loan constituted a deceptive practice under General Business Law § 349. We hold that it did not, and we therefore affirm the Appellate Division order dis…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.