Stringer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Decided 2004-10-21

Cited by 148 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Opinion of the Court by Justice KELLER. I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In June and July, 1995, Appellants, who were employees of a Monticello, Kentucky Wal-Mart, Inc. (‘Wal-Mart”) store, were terminated for “unauthorized removal of company property” and “violation of company policy” — specifically, for eating “claims candy,” i.e., candy from open or torn bags removed from…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.