Strickland v. University of Scranton

Decided 1997-09-04

Cited by 194 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

HUDOCK, Judge: In this appeal, Harry Strickland (Appellant) contends that the trial court erred in granting the preliminary objections of Appel-lee University of Scranton (the University) and the motions for summary judgment by both the University and Appellee Indira Sri-vastava (Appellee) in response to Appellant’s multi-count complaint. We affirm. The facts and procedural history may be summarized as…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.