Stransky v. Cummins Engine Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · Decided 1995-04-04

Cited by 106 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

KANNE, Circuit Judge. The predicate for this case is a familiar one: a company makes optimistic predictions about future performance, the predictions turn out to be less than prophetic, and shareholders cry foul, or more specifically, fraud. Alan Stransky and Raphael Warkel filed a class action suit against Cum-mins Engine Company, Inc. (Cummins), alleging securities fraud. The district court dismissed with prejudice, purs…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.