Stone v. Davis

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1981-04-22

Cited by 209 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Corrigan, J. In this appeal, Ashtabula S L advances six propositions of law which are considered infra. I. Propositions of law Nos. 1 through 3, which may be treated together, read as follows: “[1.] A federal truth-in-lending Regulation Z disclosure form promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board does not render a creditor using such form liable unde…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.