Steward MacHine Co. v. Davis

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1937-05-24

Cited by 738 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Butler, dissenting. I think that the objections to the challenged enactment expressed in the separate opinions of Mr. Justice McReynolds and Mr. Justice Sutherland are well taken. I am also of opinion that, in principle and as applied to bring about and to gain control over state unemployment compensation, the statutory scheme is repugnant to the Tenth Amendment: “The powers not delegated to the Uni…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.