Stedman v. Georgetown Savings & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Texas · Decided 1979-12-12

Cited by 115 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SPEARS, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would hold that the ten percent per annum charged prior to the disbursement of the funds was not a bona fide commitment fee for three reasons: (1) the trial court did not include in its findings of fact and conclusions of law a finding that the charge was reasonable 1 ; (2) there is no evidence to <page-numbe…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.