State v. Yates

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2007-09-27

Cited by 216 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

¶122 Chambers, J. (concurring) — For the most part, I concur with Justice Owens’ well reasoned opinion. However, while I agree that Robert Yates’ equitable estoppel argument should be rejected, I have considerable reservations about the sweeping scope of the majority’s statement that equitable estoppel may never be asserted by a criminal defendant against the State. Whatever the federal courts do, we…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.