State v. Woods

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1976-12-01

Cited by 223 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

I Stern, J. In case No. 76-155, appellant Reaves raises three propositions of law. Two of these assert that Ohio’s constitutional scheme for imposition of the death penalty is unconstitutional. That issue was decided by this court in State v. Bayless (1976), <a href="/opinion/6865769/state-v-bayless/" aria-description="Citation for case: State v. Bayles…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.