Celebrezze, C.J., concurring. Although I concur in paragraphs three, four, five and six of the syllabus, I am unwilling to join paragraphs one and two because, in my view, the only issue genuinely before the court in this appeal is whether the admission of appellant’s statement made to police officers was prejudicial error under Edwards v. Arizona (1981), <a href="/op…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.