State v. Weaver

Decided 1995-07-25

Cited by 166 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

SILAK, Justice, specially concurring: I concur in the Court’s opinion, and write only concerning the argument made by the state at the hearing that the impoundment and subsequent search of Pearl Weaver’s vehicle were authorized by I.C. § 49-662(3)(c). This statute authorizes impoundment of a vehicle when the person driving or in control of the vehicle is arrested for an offense requiring an appearance befo…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.