State v. Veney

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 2008-10-09

Cited by 723 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Lanzinger, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. {¶ 33} I agree with the portion of the syllabus that mandates that trial courts when conducting plea colloquies must strictly comply with all parts of Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c), including informing defendants of the right to be found guilty only upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt; I disagree with the portion of the syllabus…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.