State v. Tili

Supreme Court of Washington · Decided 2003-01-09

Cited by 105 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Madsen, J. (concurring) — I agree with the dissent that the multiple offense policy does not support an exceptional *377 sentence under the facts of this case. As the dissent points out, this case is controlled by State v. Fisher, <a href="/opinion/1304344/state-v-fisher/" aria-description="Citation for case: State v. Fis…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.