State v. Thompkins

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1996-06-05

Cited by 167 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J. At issue is the validity of R.C. 2925.03(M), 2925.11(F)(1) and 2925.23(H), 1 which mandate driver’s license suspensions upon conviction for drug offenses. Each appellant in this consolidated appeal was subject to one of the three cited statutes. The appellants challenge the constitu *560 tionality of these statutes on…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.