State v. Tate

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1979-07-11

Cited by 107 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Holmes, J., concurring. 1 concur in the decision in this case, but feel compelled to make a few observations concerning the law that this court was compelled to apply even in light of the facts presented. Justice Sweeney is correct in his conclusion that R. C. *55 2945.05 was not superseded by Crim. R. 23(A) even though so stated within…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.